In spite of being two years away, the 2017 Presidential race is as of now warming up. I anticipate a Rand

In spite of being two years away, the 2017 Presidential race is as of now warming up. I anticipate a Rand

Paul ticket to beat a Hilary Clinton ticket 53 - 43 - 4. The greater part of that 4 goes to Gary Johnson, who acquires bolster for the third biggest gathering in the country. 

On the off chance that the GOP needs to have a shot, Rand is the ticket. On the off chance that they need to lose, they ought to run with truly whatever other alternative since they won't get the libertarians, independents or youngsters (18-30) if Rand isn't the Presidential competitor. Also, Rand is cherished by liberals who really consider rather vote on partisan loyalties/spewed "news" from MSNBC, Salon or BuzzFeed.

He's the main GOP hopeful who can get enrolled Democrats to vote in favor of a Republican competitor since Rand is the irregularity who can tangle (and win) with foundation columnists/sound sheets. With Paul, you get a total upgrade of the framework: no more wars in the Middle East, end outside guide, end the IRS, end the TSA, end the NSA and nullification Obamacare. You get the government out of marriage and decriminalized pot (full authorization is up to states, which most ought to be ready by 2016, particularly in the wake of seeing economy blasting for CO and WA). With Hillary, you get... what? A greater amount of Obama's arrangements? So all the more spying, all the more lying, more bombs, more automatons, more inconclusive confinements, more dangers, more assessments, all the more printing fiat (fake) cash, all the more spending said fake cash, more obligation, more welfare, more corporate welfare, and all the more tossing cash at issues (ie. govt contractual workers that don't work) without tackling anything. More illegal fiascoes like Obamacare. More fizzled Keynesian financial aspects.

More passing and misery. More riches pulverization. Rand remains for ladies more on issues that truly matter (rape and sex trafficking) than Hillary, who underpins ladies in the "babysitter state gives citizen financed conception prevention and premature births" way. Rand secures your entitlement to carry on with your life however you see fit your own dollar, Hillary tries to give you a chance to carry on with your life on other individuals' cash. No, Rand isn't his dad, which is great and terrible. Awful in that Ron led the resurgence of libertarianism in America and Rand is delicate on a few issues where his dad was all the more firm (remote arrangement). Great in that Rand is attractive to the masses rather than constantly minimized like Ron. Ron has the privilege overall message however and we require it now like never before: if the administration would escape the way, individuals will make sense of the most ideal approach to deal with circumstances.

In the event that my expectations, from this post and the past ones about the not so distant future financial, innovative and political circumstances, are precise we could have a stunning recharging of the American Dream from 2017-2025. I'm anticipating it. You can read a greater amount of my forecasts for the not so distant future in my digital book, "A More Perfect Nation" on Amazon. More About the Author Johnny Whitfield